The Lie of Blame and the Sacrifice That Frees Us

A Journey to Truth

For the past five years, I've returned to two books that have shaped my understanding of relationships and conflict: The Anatomy of Peace and Bonds That Make Us Free (I recommend the audio book) by the Arbinger Institute founder Terry C Warner, sensing profound truth in their pages but struggling to internalize their promised change. One idea, in particular, haunted me: the claim that “blame is always a lie.” At first, I found the explanation—that blame ignores our own contributions—too simplistic for the pain of blaming a spouse, a boss, or myself. But through prayer and reflection, I uncovered deeper truths about why blame is a lie, why it demands a sacrifice, and how we can truly release it. This post shares that journey, weaving insights from Arbinger with Christian and Buddhist wisdom to reveal a path to freedom.

Blame Always Requires a Sacrifice

Blame is something we all do. When a coworker overlooks us for a project, we blame them for disrespecting us. When a spouse forgets an important date, we blame them for not caring. Even when we blame ourselves for a failure, we're assigning fault. But blame is never just about pointing fingers—it always demands a sacrifice.

When we blame someone, we're saying they're the problem, and we want them to fix it or change who they are. If I blame my boss for not promoting me, I'm demanding they give me the promotion or admit their mistake—a sacrifice of their pride or authority. When I blame my spouse, I want them to apologize or act differently, sacrificing their ego to make things right. Even blaming “the system”—like an unfair workplace—targets the people behind it, expecting reform or acknowledgment of fault.

Self-blame is no different. If I berate myself for missing a deadline, I'm sacrificing my self-worth, telling myself I'm less than others. According to The Anatomy of Peace, this comes from a “heart at war,” where we see others—or ourselves—as tools to reinforce our value, not people with equal worth. Blame creates a hierarchy where someone must lose, justifying our treatment of them or ourselves as unworthy. That loss—their pride, our dignity—is the sacrifice blame demands. Even when blame feels justified, it distorts others' worth, trapping us in a lie.

But why does blame feel so necessary? Because it promises to ease our pain by making someone else pay and abdicates our own potential fault. If a person is somehow less-than and blame-worthy, it had better be someone else because we cannot face the fact that we might be somehow inferior. Yet, as we'll see, this promise is built on lies that trap us in conflict.

Blame Is Always a Lie

The Arbinger Institute taught me that “blame is always a lie,” and I've come to see two ways this is true: blame lies about who causes our emotions, and it lies about anyone's worth.

First, blame says someone else makes us feel the way we do. If I'm furious because someone cut me off on the freeway, I might blame them for my anger. But the truth is, their action didn't make me angry—my story about it did. Maybe I told myself, “They're a selfish driver,” and that interpretation sparked my rage. As Bonds That Make Us Free suggests, we contribute to our emotions by how we see others. Blaming another person ignores my role in the story, making it a lie that keeps me stuck.

Second, blame lies by implying someone is inferior. When I blame the driver, I'm saying they're less considerate or worthy than me, justifying my anger. But this denies a deeper truth: every person has infinite, unmeasurable worth. Whether it's blaming a coworker, a spouse, or ourselves, blame creates a false hierarchy where someone must be “less” to make us feel “more.” When I blame myself, I'm still buying the lie that someone—me—must be inferior to explain the situation, sacrificing my worth instead of another's. This is the heart of blame's deception—it distorts reality, treating people as objects to prop up our ego, as Arbinger warns. Even when blame feels justified, it distorts others' worth, trapping us in a lie.

These lies—about causality and worth—fuel blame's demand for sacrifice. We want others to admit fault or change because it reinforces our story of blamelessness. This is also why the next logical place to look is to blame ourselves for our situation, but this is the same lie reframed. But there's a way out, a sacrifice that undoes these lies and sets us free.

Releasing Blame: The Ultimate Sacrifice

So, how do we escape blame's cycle of lies and sacrifices? The answer lies in a truth that transcends traditions: “You matter, and they matter.” Christianity and Buddhism, in their own languages, offer a sacrifice that reconnects us with this truth, dissolving blame's grip.

The Christian Solution: Christ as the Sacrifice for Blame

In Christianity, blame is a sin—a lie that distorts God's creation by devaluing others. The good news is that Christ's sacrifice on the cross pays for all sin, including blame. When I blame a friend for betraying me, I'm demanding they sacrifice their pride to make things right. But Christ's death offers a different sacrifice, one that covers my sin of blame, their sin of betrayal, and frees me from needing anything from my friend.

There's more to this sacrifice, as I explored in my post “The Truth That Frees Us.” Christ is both the historical Jesus, who died for our sins, and an internal presence—a whisper in our minds that says, “You matter, and they matter” (Galatians 2:20). When I place my blame on this “internal Christ,” I'm not just confessing; I'm reconnecting with the truth that my friend is as valuable as I am. The urge to prove I'm right or seek revenge fades because Christ's sacrifice has already paid the price. As Jesus said, “The truth will set you free” (John 8:32), and this truth—universal worth—frees me to love instead of blame.

The Buddhist Parallel: Releasing Blame Through Awareness

Buddhism takes a different path but reaches the same truth. Blame, in Buddhism, comes from our ego's false belief (read: lie) in separateness or superiority (a false hierarchy). Through mindfulness, we see these as illusions (i.e. stories made up in our minds), recognizing that all beings are interconnected and equally worthy. This awareness is like a sacrifice of our ego, letting go of the need to blame to feel better.

While Buddhism doesn't speak of a savior, practices like loving-kindness (metta) reconnect us with the truth: “You matter, and they matter.” Just as Christians hear the internal Christ, Buddhists cultivate compassion to dissolve blame's lies, embracing shared humanity.

A Unified Truth

God’s ways transcend our instinct to blame, as Isaiah 55:8 reminds us: “For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways.” Yet, the Lord God “giveth light unto the understanding; for he speaketh unto men according to their language, unto their understanding” (2 Nephi 31:3, Book of Mormon). Because we viscerally feel blame's demand for a sacrifice, God provides one in Christ—both the Savior and the inner voice affirming universal worth. For Buddhists, this light shines through mindfulness, sacrificing ego to reveal the same truth: “You matter, and they matter.” In both paths, this sacrifice undoes blame's lies, ending the spiritual deadening of treating others as objects and restoring a heart at peace, where we see them as people.

Releasing blame isn't a one-time fix but a practice—through prayer, meditation, or pausing to hear and then honor that inner whisper. Each time we choose this sacrifice, we live out the truth that sets us free.

Conclusion

Blame promises to ease our pain but traps us in lies and sacrifices that hurt us and others. By recognizing its deception and embracing the sacrifice offered in Christ or mindfulness, we can break free, living from a heart at peace. Christians can use prayer and introspection about why they need to blame to release this trap. Buddhists can leverage metta to foster compassion. Agnostics can reflect on why their mind clings to blame and what it seeks.

I invite you to reflect: Where is blame holding you back, and how might this truth—“you matter, and they matter”—set you free?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Lehi’s Path Anew: Choosing Love Over Fear

In the Book of Mormon, a prophet named Lehi has a vision of a tree bearing life-giving fruit, a narrow path leading to it, and obstacles like a mist of darkness and a great and spacious building ( 1 Nephi 8 ). Traditionally seen as a metaphor for life’s spiritual journey, Lehi’s dream also holds a deeper truth: it’s a pattern we live over and over. Each encounter puts us on the path anew—a chance to choose truth, honor worth, and resist comparison. The Iron Rod: Christ's Guiding Example In Lehi’s dream, an iron rod runs alongside the narrow path, offering a steady guide for those seeking the Tree of Life. It is “the word of God” ( 1 Nephi 11:25 ), but the Word is Christ Himself ( Doctrine and Covenants 93:8 )—not just the message, but the messenger. The rod is His example, guiding us with a simple whisper: “You matter. And they matter.” To hold the rod is to choose compassion and truth in every interaction, following the Spirit’s nudge toward connection ( Moroni 7:16...
Read more

Enough

I live in a world where I feel the need to prove myself. I constantly need to prove that I am enough in any of an unlimited number of categories of "enough", such as smart enough, strong enough, cool enough, righteous enough, or wealthy enough. But to whom am I actually proving myself? It seems like I am trying to prove my worth to other people, and as a result, I am constantly waiting for evidence that I have been successful at proving my worth. I am constantly on edge with the fear that I may never be enough. Can I ever give enough evidence to other people to change their minds if they don't want to change their minds? If other people don't actually want to change their minds they will always find a way to keep me from being in the "enough" bucket (For example, thinking to themselves "Yeah, but you're still a jerk!")
Read more

All My Friends Are Imaginary

I talk to ghosts. Phantoms, really. Every day, I have conversations—sometimes arguments—with people I think I know. My friends, my family, the waiter who messes up my order. But here's the kicker: they're not real. Not the versions I'm talking to, anyway. Every person I interact with exists in my head as a mental model—a flimsy, half-baked caricature I've pieced together from scraps of time spent with them. A few shared laughs, a handful of stories, a quick exchange about the weather. That's it. That's all I've got to work with. And yet, I convince myself these models are the real deal. I talk to them, confide in them, get mad at them. But they're not the actual people. They're shadows I've cast on the wall of my mind, and I'm the one holding the flashlight. Take my friend Alex, for example. In my head, Alex is reliable, always up for a deep conversation, and perpetually amused by my terrible puns. That's the Alex I hang o...
Read more